Doug Melville, the Canadian Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments and Howard Sapers, the Corectional Investigator of Canada led a thought-provoking workshop at Ryerson University, Toronto on the afternoon of May 9, 2012. The question posed was whether a complainant's unique circumstances, particulary cognitive impairment or mental illness, have a bearing on fairness.
Mr. Sapers' office (which has a legislative basis) receives complaints from inmates of federal penitentiaries, a constituency with a high incidence of mental illness and addiction. By definition, incarcertation involves curtailment of personal freedom and the exercise of power by the state. Mr.Sapers pointed out that complainants with mental health issues may have difficulty communicating their concerns or comprehending the basis of decisions that impact them personally. Therefore, intake staff must exercise patience and devote their full attention to the individual seeking help.
Mr. Mellville's office (which has voluntary indusytry particiation) informally handles complaints from customers of Canadian financial institutions, a constituency that includes a high proportion of elderly individuals and newcomers to Canada. He pondered the extent to which power differentials should inform his work and raised the question of how far a financial institution should be expected to go to accomodate people with special needs such as cognitive impairments or addictions. Of concern to Mr. Melville was the fact that financial institutions must systematized and routinized their services to be cost effective.
A lively discussion took place during this session, leaving audience members to think more deeply about how an ombuds best intervenes in the relationship between an individuals and an institution.